Re: Tiger oops in ia64_sal_physical_id_info (was [RFC] regression:113134fcbca83619be4c68d0ca66db6093777b5d)

From: Russ Anderson <rja_at_sgi.com>
Date: 2008-02-28 03:50:25
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:34:19PM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
> > SAL 2.9: SGI SN2 version 1.30
> 
> I wouldn't expect SAL 2.9 to implement a call defined in SAL 3.2,
> unless I'm seriously misunderstanding something?

The answer is the 2.9 value is hardcoded in the Altix prom and
was not updated to 3.2 even though the prom supports SAL 3.2.

-- 
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead  
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc          rja@sgi.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Feb 28 03:50:44 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2008-02-28 03:50:57 EST