> makes the Makefile work even for a non-executable file for when you use > inferior tools, but does that mean that we should have thrown away the > information that it *is* an executable file when not using those inferior > tools? Once I added the "python " in front of the name in the Makefile, the need for it to be executable went away ... so I did the chmod deliberately as it looked like we didn't need the execute bit any more. This is only wrong if there are people in the habit of running arch/ia64/scripts/unwcheck.py manually from the command line. I've never done this ... but perhaps someone might be sad that I took the execute bit away. -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Dec 11 10:09:49 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-12-11 10:10:05 EST