Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-03-20 05:38:45
On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:
> * Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> [2007-03-19 19:29]:
> > >
> > > -void
> > > +int
> > >  register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action)
> > >  {
> >
> > Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the
> > return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get
> > these in-line while you are modifying them anyway?
>
> Because all other functions in that file are coded this way. I think
> it looks better if you don't change the style in a particular file.
> Am I wrong?
>
Consistency within the file certainly makes sense.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Mar 20 05:39:19 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-03-20 05:39:35 EST