Re: fault-injection framework on ia64

From: Akinobu Mita <>
Date: 2007-02-17 04:30:53
> But if STACKTRACE depends on STACKTRACE_SUPPORT, which isn't defined on ia64,
> kconfig should disable FAULT_INJECTION altogether with my patch (as it did
> before it). I don't think that FAULT_INJECTION could be enabled before my
> patch, right?
> _BUT_ probably STACKTRACE_SUPPORT should be defined, with default n and no
> prompt, on ia64, or Kconfig gets confused (it should output a warning,
> like 'undefined symbol STACKTRACE_SUPPORT'). We on UML used to get warning
> when INPUT was used but not defined. Hmmm....

Really? I intentionaly removed the STACKTRACE_SUPPORT in x86_64 Kconfig, then
I did make menuconfig. But I didn't get such warning.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Sat Feb 17 05:04:32 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-02-17 05:05:02 EST