swiotlb_sync_sg() issue?

From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich_at_novell.com>
Date: 2006-12-19 22:10:59
Due to its apparent obviousness, I'm afraid I'm missing something, but isn't it
incorrect that lib/swiotlb.c:swiotlb_sync_sg() calls sync_single() with
sg->dma_address simply cast to void* rather than going through phys_to_virt()?

Also, for ia64, isn't mark_clean() violating its own comment, i.e. to mark only
*complete* pages? And then, for completeness, isn't swiotlb_sync_sg() missing
the call to mark_clean()?

Thanks, Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Dec 19 22:30:34 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-12-19 22:30:49 EST