Re: [RFC] virtual memmap for sparsemem [1/2] arch independent part

From: Christoph Lameter <>
Date: 2006-10-20 02:43:51
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Andy Whitcroft wrote:

> This is a good thing too as one of the main issues we've had with the
> VIRTUAL_MEMMAP stuff is this need to pfn_valid each and every
> conversion.  Of course the same change could be applied there just as well.

Well it should have been done instead of adding this strange hole logic.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Fri Oct 20 02:44:44 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-10-20 02:44:56 EST