Re: Sending cpu 0 back to SAL slave loop

From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew_at_wil.cx>
Date: 2006-10-07 06:44:43
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:39:10PM -0500, Jack Steiner wrote:
> For kexec, it is ESSENTIAL that all cpus except for the one doing
> the kexec be returned to the SAL slave loop. If this is not done, our
> chipset will misdirect IO interrupts on the newly exec'ed kernel.

Could you do an IPI call to have CPU 0 do the kexec and have the CPU
that sent the IPI fall into the SAL slave loop instead?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Sat Oct 07 06:45:18 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-10-07 06:45:29 EST