Re: Synchronizing Bit operations V2

From: Chris Wright <chrisw_at_sous-sol.org>
Date: 2006-03-31 17:10:37
* David Mosberger-Tang (David.Mosberger@acm.org) wrote:
> I have to agree with Hans and I'd much prefer making the mode part of
> the operation's
> name and not a parameter.  Besides being The Right Thing, it saves a
> lot of typing.
> For example:
> 
> +       set_bit_mode(nr, addr, MODE_ATOMIC);
> 
> would simply become
> 
> +       set_bit_atomic(nr, addr);

That's the approach Xen took as well.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Fri Mar 31 17:10:37 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-03-31 17:10:46 EST