RE: Synchronizing Bit operations V2

From: Christoph Lameter <>
Date: 2006-03-31 13:55:47
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:

> By the way, this is the same thing on x86: look at include/asm-i386/bitops.h:
> #define smp_mb__before_clear_bit()      barrier()
> #define smp_mb__after_clear_bit()       barrier()
> A simple compiler barrier, nothing but
> #define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory")
> See, no memory ordering there, because clear_bit already has a LOCK prefix.

And that implies barrier behavior right?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Fri Mar 31 13:56:34 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-03-31 13:56:43 EST