Re: Fix unlock_buffer() to work the same way as bit_unlock()

From: Christoph Lameter <>
Date: 2006-03-29 13:23:24
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:

> However, I think it might be reaonsable to use bit lock operations for
> in places like page lock and buffer lock (ie. with acquire and relese
> semantics). It improves ia64 without harming other architectures, and
> also makes the code more expressive.

How would be express the acquire and release semantics?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Wed Mar 29 13:42:06 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-03-29 13:45:24 EST