Jes> first: git-clone Jes> rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux-2.6.git Jes> then: [jes@tomahawk linux-2.6]$ git-pull fatal: Needed a single Jes> revision Pulling into a black hole? Jes> Matthew suggested that I use git: of rsync: and strangely enough that Jes> works. Baffling, but hey, I now have what I wanted ;) I'm not sure what happened. I did swap-out my links to the packfiles in Linus' tree ... but I ran the "git prune" and "git-update-server-info" afterwards. So the tree should have been consistent (but possibly might have had some objects in the packfiles that might not have been needed by the heads in my tree if Linus was ahead of my tree). In general the "rsync:" protocol should be the lowest overhead for a fresh clone, but "git:" should be better for subsequent pulls and fetches. -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Feb 15 03:57:51 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-02-15 03:59:01 EST