Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h

From: Richard Henderson <>
Date: 2006-01-27 04:30:14
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 05:34:12AM +0100, Edgar Toernig wrote:
> Why shift at all?

Becuase that *is* a valid architecture tuning knob.  Most risc
machines can't AND with arbitrary constants like that, and loading
the constant might bulk things up more than just using the shift.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Fri Jan 27 04:32:37 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-01-27 04:32:44 EST