>> You could use the "S" constraint here. This isn't used anywhere in >> gcc. This exists solely for use by asms that need a non-postinc MEM. > >Alas, it does not work: So should I go with the original patch using "r"? I agree with Andreas' assessment that it doesn't matter that we didn't tell gcc that memory was being changed, since the memory that gets changed isn't in a space that gcc knows about. Or are there any more letters of the alphabet to try :-) -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Nov 22 09:13:14 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-11-22 09:13:28 EST