RE: [PATCH] - Make pfn_valid more precise for SGI Altix systems

From: Luck, Tony <>
Date: 2005-11-10 10:34:46
Ignore earlier message ... I thought I saw a || when you really
just have && all the way through this:

+# define pfn_valid(pfn)		(((pfn) >= min_low_pfn) && ((pfn) < max_low_pfn) && ia64_pfn_valid(pfn))

Doesn't that mean that you are optimizing for the case where some
one passed in a bad pfn ... does that really happen a lot?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Nov 10 10:35:22 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-11-10 10:35:37 EST