Robin Holt wrote on Friday, November 04, 2005 1:38 PM > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:51:07AM -0800, Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > > Luck, Tony wrote on Wednesday, November 02, 2005 8:31 AM > > > Good to hear that (though I must remember to specify what I mean > > > by "small memory" when talking to SGI ... there are ia64 boxes > > > with only 1G :-) > > > > > > Ken: Any predictions on when a 4-level run might get to the > > > top of your queue for a run with an industry standard transaction > > > benchmark? > > > > It turns out that we have measurable performance regression with > > 4-level page table running industry database benchmark, the penalty > > is ~0.2% (I thought the number would be smaller than 0.2%, but ...). > > Our resolution with this workload is typically 0.05%. > > Can you point me at this benchmark? I hope everyone knows by now what this "industry standard database transaction processing benchmark" is. If not, please google it. Sorry, this is the best I can do without breaking any U.S. law. - Ken - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sat Nov 05 08:43:04 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-11-05 08:43:22 EST