RE: One-line patch for systems with ACPI enabled but incomplete tree

From: Brown, Len <len.brown_at_intel.com>
Date: 2005-09-01 07:51:36
 
>If FADT is absolutely required for every ACPI tree, I see why
>there is no check in the kernel code.  However, it still seems
>like a bug to me as everything else works if the FADT pointer
>is zero (with the above one line patch).

ACPI has to jump through a lot of hoops due to broken systems.
I don't want to add, test, and support an "FADT optional" hoop
unless absolutely necessary.

>Thanks for the pointer... I will go find it and see if I can
>leverage the code.

please do -- that is why we write it:-)

-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Sep 01 07:53:40 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-09-01 07:53:47 EST