Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo_at_elte.hu>
Date: 2005-07-29 19:01:22
* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> >>processes    1               2               3              4
> >>
> >>2.6.13-rc4:  187, 183, 179   260, 259, 256   340, 320, 349  504, 496, 500
> >>no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177   254, 254, 253   268, 270, 348  345, 290, 500
> >>
> >>Numbers are MB/s, higher is better.
> >
> >
> >what type of network was used - localhost or a real one?
> >
> 
> Localhost. Yeah it isn't a real world test, but it does show the 
> erratic behaviour without wake affine.

yeah - fine enough. (It's not representative for IO workloads, but it's 
representative for local IPC workloads, just wanted to know precisely 
which workload it is.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Fri Jul 29 05:04:52 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:40 EST