Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo_at_elte.hu>
Date: 2005-07-29 18:53:40
* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> Well, you can easily see suboptimal scheduling decisions on many 
> programs with lots of interprocess communication. For example, tbench 
> on a dual Xeon:
> 
> processes    1               2               3              4
> 
> 2.6.13-rc4:  187, 183, 179   260, 259, 256   340, 320, 349  504, 496, 500
> no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177   254, 254, 253   268, 270, 348  345, 290, 500
> 
> Numbers are MB/s, higher is better.

what type of network was used - localhost or a real one?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Fri Jul 29 04:59:16 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:40 EST