Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags

From: Nick Piggin <>
Date: 2005-07-29 12:01:14
Chen, Kenneth W wrote:

>Nick Piggin wrote on Thursday, July 28, 2005 6:46 PM
>>I'd like to try making them less aggressive first if possible.
>Well, that's exactly what I'm trying to do: make them not aggressive
>at all by not performing any load balance :-)  The workload gets maximum
>benefit with zero aggressiveness.

Unfortunately we can't forget about other workloads, and we're
trying to stay away from runtime tunables in the scheduler.

If we can get performance to within a couple of tenths of a percent
of the zero balancing case, then that would be preferable I think.

Send instant messages to your online friends 
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Jul 28 22:03:46 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:40 EST