Christoph wrote: > This is an implementation that deals with monitoring and managing running > processes. So is this patch roughly equivalent to adding a pid to the mbind/set_mempolicy/get_mempolicy system calls? Not that I am advocating for or against adding doing that. But this seems like alot of code, with new and exciting API details, just to add a pid argument, if such it be. Andi - could you remind us all why you chose not to have a pid argument in these calls? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Jul 15 02:05:19 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:40 EST