Re: [PATCH] pcibus_to_node implementation for IA64

From: Christoph Lameter <>
Date: 2005-06-24 07:20:08
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Jesse Barnes wrote:

> It looks like you're adding the new 'node' field unconditionally, but 
> protecting the sba assignment by CONFIG_NUMA?  Which one is wrong? :)

if !CONFIG_NUMA then the node field exists but is always -1, which will 
result in node unspecific allocations.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Jun 23 17:23:34 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:39 EST