Re: [PATCH] remove redundant irq_affinity definition

From: David Mosberger <davidm_at_napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 2005-03-15 06:36:55
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:28:01 -0800, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> said:

  Jesse> What about for the mmu_context_t functions?

I looked briefly into this one and concluded that we shouldn't put the
"volatile" inside the mmu_context_t declaration.  Having said that,
we'll need to be very careful about this change to make sure we
compensate with the necessary barriers were we access context-ids
outside of spinlock-protected critical sections.

	--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Mon Mar 14 14:39:00 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:36 EST