Re: [PATCH/RFC] I/O-check interface for driver's error handling

From: Hidetoshi Seto <>
Date: 2005-03-04 13:03:29
Linas Vepstas wrote:
>>If their defaults are no-ops, device
>>maintainers who develops their driver on not-implemented arch should be
>>more careful. 
> Why? People who write device drivers already know if/when they need to
> disable interrupts, and so they already disable if they need it.  

OK, I'll remake them as no-ops.
Nothing will start unless trust in driver folks.

> p.s. I would like to have iochk_read() take struct pci_dev * as an
> argument.  (I could store a pointer to pci_dev in the "cookie" but
> that seems odd).

I'd like to store the pointer and handle all only with the cookie...
Or is it needed to pass different device to iochk_clear() and iochk_read()?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Mar 3 21:16:04 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:36 EST