On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 11:38 +0100, Alexander Nyberg wrote: > ===== arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_signal.c 1.35 vs edited ===== > --- 1.35/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_signal.c 2005-01-25 21:23:45 +01:00 > +++ edited/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_signal.c 2005-02-20 11:32:55 +01:00 > @@ -460,9 +460,9 @@ __ia32_rt_sigsuspend (compat_sigset_t *s > sigset_t oldset, set; > > scr->scratch_unat = 0; /* avoid leaking kernel bits to user level */ > - memset(&set, 0, sizeof(&set)); > + memset(&set, 0, sizeof(sigset_t)); To check that the above is correct, you have to go look up the declaration of "set". Why not do this: + memset(&set, 0, sizeof(set)); which is clearly correct, regardless of the declaration? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Feb 22 12:39:54 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:36 EST