Re: [rfc] generic allocator and mspec driver

From: Robin Holt <>
Date: 2005-02-16 07:24:14
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 03:02:01PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >>>>> "Robin" == Robin Holt <> writes:
> Robin> Would anybody have a concern with marking those cache lines as
> Robin> processor uncached only?  Would there ever be a time that we
> Robin> would expect _ANY_ type of cached reference when the granule is
> Robin> being used for uncached that would be an acceptable use?
> Robin,
> I don't see any valid such cases. In principle one has to go through
> the reverse procedure to convert something from uncached to cached and
> since we don't do that in any place I don't see any valid reason to do
> so. Anyone doing it in kdb etc. would be in for what they are getting,
> so I  don't think thats valid concern.

I guess I didn't follow you.  Are you saying you would have no concern
with changing the memory protections to prevent that type of reference?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Tue Feb 15 15:26:24 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:35 EST