Re: [patch] Resched skip_rbs_switch to run 4 cycles faster on McKinley-type cores.

From: David Mosberger <davidm_at_napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 2005-01-28 13:08:18
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:26:18 +1100, Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com> said:

  Keith> Unwinding across firmware is not an issue here, we have two
  Keith> views of the MCA/INIT context.  One view is "how to return to
  Keith> SAL?", that data is stored outside the stack.  The other view
  Keith> is "what was the cpu doing when the event occurred?".  It is
  Keith> the latter that I am working on.

How is this different from the "unw_init_from_interruption" call that
we're doing in mca.c:init_handler_platform()?

	--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Jan 27 21:08:42 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:35 EST