>>>>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:24:02 -0800, James E Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org> said: James> On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 13:56, James E Wilson wrote: >> However, rather than add more ITANIUM_BSTEP_SPECIFIC support to >> the kernel, I think it makes more sense to obsolete it and remove >> it. James> Here is the change I am suggesting. Looks fine to me. I found one more reference to CONFIG_ITANIUM_BSTEP_SPECIFIC in arch/ia64/configs/bigsur_defconfig. Not that it really matters, but from a cleanliness perspective, we may want to get rid of that at the same time. I would have done it myself but there was no "Signed-off-by" trailer in your patch so I think you may need to resend the patch anyhow before Tony will take it (unless he judges the patch to be trivial enough not to need this). --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Jan 27 20:55:46 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:35 EST