RE: [patch] fix per-CPU MCA mess and make UP kernels work again

From: Luck, Tony <>
Date: 2005-01-27 06:23:06
>It seems logical to me that MCA data be close to the node/cpu using
>it, but workable if it is not.

Since performance is not an issue here, and there isn't a functionality
reason for allocating per-node, I'd vote for whatever is the cleanest
code implementation.  Part of the pit I've dug myself into is caused by
the complexity of the contig/discontig code ... if we can make it simpler,
perhaps I won't break it all again.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Wed Jan 26 14:23:25 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:35 EST