David Mosberger wrote: > > BTW: can you remind me why you want node-local MCA data? Performance > is probably not an issue. Are you concerned about error-containment, > hot-swap, or something else? I'm not aware of a compelling functional reason that the MCA data has to be node-local. The key feature is that each CPU have a unique MCA data area. If all the MCA data areas are on one node, that should be OK. If a CPU cannot access MCA data memory on a remote node, odds are we will die anyway. It seems logical to me that MCA data be close to the node/cpu using it, but workable if it is not. -- Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Jan 26 14:03:03 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:35 EST