Re: [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives

From: Ingo Molnar <>
Date: 2005-01-21 03:59:37
* Ingo Molnar <> wrote:

> * Linus Torvalds <> wrote:
> > I can do ppc64 myself, can others fix the other architectures (Ingo,
> > shouldn't the UP case have the read/write_can_lock() cases too? And
> > wouldn't you agree that it makes more sense to have the rwlock test
> > variants in asm/rwlock.h?):
> this one adds it to x64. (untested at the moment) [...]

with this patch the x64 SMP+PREEMPT kernel builds & boots fine on an UP
x64 box. (this is not a full test but better than nothing.) [the other 8
spinlock patches were all applied as well.]

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Jan 20 12:17:42 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:34 EST