Re: [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives

From: Ingo Molnar <>
Date: 2005-01-21 03:40:38
* Linus Torvalds <> wrote:

> I can do ppc64 myself, can others fix the other architectures (Ingo,
> shouldn't the UP case have the read/write_can_lock() cases too? And
> wouldn't you agree that it makes more sense to have the rwlock test
> variants in asm/rwlock.h?):

You are right about UP, and the patch below adds the UP variants. It's
analogous to the existing wrapping concept that UP 'spinlocks' are
always unlocked on UP. (spin_can_lock() is already properly defined on
UP too.)


Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <>

--- linux/include/linux/spinlock.h.orig
+++ linux/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -228,6 +228,9 @@ typedef struct {
 #define rwlock_yield(lock)	(void)(lock)
+#define read_can_lock(lock)	(((void)(lock), 1))
+#define write_can_lock(lock)	(((void)(lock), 1))
 #define _spin_trylock(lock)	({preempt_disable(); _raw_spin_trylock(lock) ? \
 				1 : ({preempt_enable(); 0;});})
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Jan 20 11:48:31 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:34 EST