Re: Horrible regression with -CURRENT from "Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks" patch

From: Peter Chubb <>
Date: 2005-01-19 20:18:06
>>>>> "Ingo" == Ingo Molnar <> writes:

Ingo> * Peter Chubb <> wrote:

>> Here's a patch that adds the missing read_is_locked() and
>> write_is_locked() macros for IA64.  When combined with Ingo's
>> patch, I can boot an SMP kernel with CONFIG_PREEMPT on.
>> However, I feel these macros are misnamed: read_is_locked() returns
>> true if the lock is held for writing; write_is_locked() returns
>> true if the lock is held for reading or writing.

Ingo> well, 'read_is_locked()' means: "will a read_lock() succeed"

Fail, surely?

Dr Peter Chubb  peterc AT
The technical we do immediately,  the political takes *forever*
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Wed Jan 19 04:24:18 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:34 EST