Re: Horrible regression with -CURRENT from "Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks" patch

From: Ingo Molnar <>
Date: 2005-01-19 19:04:03
* Peter Chubb <> wrote:

> Here's a patch that adds the missing read_is_locked() and
> write_is_locked() macros for IA64.  When combined with Ingo's patch, I
> can boot an SMP kernel with CONFIG_PREEMPT on.
> However, I feel these macros are misnamed: read_is_locked() returns
> true if the lock is held for writing; write_is_locked() returns true
> if the lock is held for reading or writing.

well, 'read_is_locked()' means: "will a read_lock() succeed" [assuming
no races]. Should name it read_trylock_test()/write_trylock_test()

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Wed Jan 19 03:11:36 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:34 EST