Re: page table lock patch V15 [0/7]: overview II

From: Andi Kleen <>
Date: 2005-01-14 21:47:32
> I have a question for the x86 gurus. We're currently using the lock
> prefix for set_64bit. This will lock the bus for the RMW cycle, but
> is it a prerequisite for the atomic 64-bit store? Even on UP?

An atomic 64bit store doesn't need a lock prefix. A cmpxchg will
need to though. Note that UP kernels define LOCK to nothing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Fri Jan 14 05:49:35 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:34 EST