Re: [patch 2/3] Replace pci_find_device with pci_get_device - pci.c

--On Monday, January 10, 2005 02:21:56 PM -0700 Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 13:09 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Monday, January 10, 2005 11:46 am, domen@coderock.org wrote:
>> > -  while ((dev = pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL)
>> > +  while ((dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL)
>> >     acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
>> 
>> Shouldn't this be for_each_pci_dev(dev) acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev); instead?  
>> Bjorn?
> 
> They're equivalent, right?  Looks OK to me either way.  I guess
> if you switch to for_each_pci_dev(), you could switch the one
> in sba_iommu.c, too.


Ok. Here is the reroll of the original patch to us for_each_pci_dev:

Signed-off-by: Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>

diff -Nrup linux-2.6.10cln/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c linux-2.6.10p/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
--- linux-2.6.10cln/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c	2005-01-10 15:45:16.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.10p/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c	2005-01-10 15:54:35.564251536 -0800
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ extern acpi_status acpi_map_iosapic (acp
 		printk(KERN_INFO "** was specified.  If this was required to make a driver work,\n");
 		printk(KERN_INFO "** please email the output of \"lspci\" to bjorn.helgaas@hp.com\n");
 		printk(KERN_INFO "** so I can fix the driver.\n");
-		while ((dev = pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL)
+		for_each_pci_dev(dev)
 			acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
 	} else {
 		printk(KERN_INFO "** PCI interrupts are no longer routed automatically.  If this\n");



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html