On Thursday, January 6, 2005 12:00 pm, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:50:56 -0800, Jesse Barnes > >>>>> <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> said: > >> > >> It's not opinion, it's reality. Unless someone goes through all > >> the files in the top-level directories and formats them to 80 > >> cols, this won't change. > > Jesse> I'd be happy to do that if you're ok with it. > > Eh, I'm talking about linux/kernel/* etc, so it's really Andrew and > Linus who'd have to be OK with it. > > If you can fix those, I'd be happy to adjust the ia64 files to fit > within 80 cols. Really? In my experience the core files are generally pretty good (every now and then a long line creeps in, but there aren't that many that I can see). Any big offenders that really bug you? > I don't particularly like 100 cols. I'd be happy if all (major) Linux > kernel files fit into 80 cols, it's just that in reality, you need 100 > cols to look at most important kernel files. Well if you don't like them either (that makes none that I know of), shouldn't we at least fixup the ia64 bits, regardless of what happens with the core kernel files? Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Jan 6 15:11:16 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:34 EST