Re: [PATCH] cleanup swiotlb.c a bit

From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes_at_engr.sgi.com>
Date: 2005-01-07 07:07:57
On Thursday, January 6, 2005 12:00 pm, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:50:56 -0800, Jesse Barnes
> >>>>> <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> said:
>   >>
>   >>  It's not opinion, it's reality.  Unless someone goes through all
>   >> the files in the top-level directories and formats them to 80
>   >> cols, this won't change.
>
>   Jesse> I'd be happy to do that if you're ok with it.
>
> Eh, I'm talking about linux/kernel/* etc, so it's really Andrew and
> Linus who'd have to be OK with it.
>
> If you can fix those, I'd be happy to adjust the ia64 files to fit
> within 80 cols.

Really?  In my experience the core files are generally pretty good (every now 
and then a long line creeps in, but there aren't that many that I can see).  
Any big offenders that really bug you?

> I don't particularly like 100 cols.  I'd be happy if all (major) Linux
> kernel files fit into 80 cols, it's just that in reality, you need 100
> cols to look at most important kernel files.

Well if you don't like them either (that makes none that I know of), shouldn't 
we at least fixup the ia64 bits, regardless of what happens with the core 
kernel files?

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Jan 6 15:11:16 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:34 EST