Re: page fault scalability patch V14 [5/7]: x86_64 atomic pte operations

From: Christoph Lameter <clameter_at_sgi.com>
Date: 2005-01-05 06:58:13
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> writes:
>
> I bet this has been never tested.

I tested this back in October and it worked fine. Would you be able to
test your proposed modifications and send me a patch?

> > +#define pmd_test_and_populate(mm, pmd, pte) \
> > +		(cmpxchg((int *)pmd, PMD_NONE, _PAGE_TABLE | __pa(pte)) == PMD_NONE)
> > +#define pud_test_and_populate(mm, pud, pmd) \
> > +		(cmpxchg((int *)pgd, PUD_NONE, _PAGE_TABLE | __pa(pmd)) == PUD_NONE)
> > +#define pgd_test_and_populate(mm, pgd, pud) \
> > +		(cmpxchg((int *)pgd, PGD_NONE, _PAGE_TABLE | __pa(pud)) == PGD_NONE)
> > +
>
> Shouldn't this all be (long *)pmd ? page table entries on x86-64 are 64bit.
> Also why do you cast at all? i think the macro should handle an arbitary
> pointer.

The macro checks for the size of the pointer and then generates the
appropriate cmpxchg instruction. pgd_t is a struct which may be
problematic for the cmpxchg macros.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Jan 4 15:07:18 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:33 EST