On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:04:14PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:01:59PM -0800, Ashok Raj wrote: > > @@ -609,8 +643,10 @@ void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) > > * TBD: Enable this when physical removal > > * or when we put the processor is put in > > * SAL_BOOT_RENDEZ mode > > - * cpu_clear(cpu, cpu_callin_map); > > + cpu_clear(cpu, cpu_callin_map); > > + printk ("Clearing cpu_callin_map\n"); > > */ > > + printk ("Now cpu %d is dead\n", cpu); > > return; > > } > > current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; > > Is this just a debugging printk? I wouldn't be too happy if a customer > sees the message "Now cpu 3 is dead" in their logs. I can almost hear > the terrified support call now ... Very funny!! I will change it, if there are any updates in the next round. > > "I asked the machine to take the CPU offline and now it's dead! My boss > is going to kill me!" > -- Cheers, Ashok Raj - Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Dec 7 10:57:59 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:33 EST