Re: deferred rss update instead of sloppy rss

From: Christoph Lameter <>
Date: 2004-11-23 09:39:19
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:

> Deferred rss might be a practical solution, but I'd prefer this if it can
> be made workable.

Both results in an additional field in task_struct that is going to be
incremented when the page_table_lock is not held. It would be possible
to switch to looping in procfs later. The main question with this patchset

How and when can we get this get into the kernel?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Mon Nov 22 21:27:23 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:32 EST