Re: deferred rss update instead of sloppy rss

From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: 2004-11-23 10:14:02
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> 
>>Deferred rss might be a practical solution, but I'd prefer this if it can
>>be made workable.
> 
> 
> Both results in an additional field in task_struct that is going to be
> incremented when the page_table_lock is not held. It would be possible
> to switch to looping in procfs later. The main question with this patchset
> is:
> 

Sure.

> How and when can we get this get into the kernel?
> 

Well it is a good starting platform for the various PTL reduction patches
floating around.

I'd say Andrew could be convinced to stick it in -mm after 2.6.10, but we'd
probably need a clear path to one of the PTL patches before anything would
move into 2.6.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Mon Nov 22 19:46:59 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:32 EST