Re: [PATCH] make INIT# handler call panic

From: Cliff Larsen <>
Date: 2004-11-12 04:12:08
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 19:55, Takao Indoh wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:53:38 -0500, Philip R Auld wrote:
> >
> >We are still mostly a working with 2.4 (rhel3 which has netdump_func hooks) 
> >and this all worked fine. A crashdump hook, a call to panic, or a call 
> >to BUG each worked.
> Crashdump itself succeeds, but isn't there any problem in analyzing
> dump? Backtrace of "current" on each cpu seem to not work because
> switch_stack is not saved correctly.

We are seeing the same behavior with our 2.4 - we can backtrace all
process but the active.

Cliff Larsen <>

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Nov 11 12:12:36 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:32 EST