Re: removing mm->rss and mm->anon_rss from kernel?

From: Erich Focht <>
Date: 2004-11-09 04:26:16
On Monday 08 November 2004 17:57, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:30:37 +0100 Erich Focht <> escribió:
> > You're talking about clusters, i.e. multiple running instances of the
> > operating system. I don't think anybody really wants to go far beyond
> > 512 nowadays. Application-wise 512 cpus/node isn't really needed (but
> <the newspaper guy>
> SGI is already building one of 1024 CPUs according to some sources:
> but...
> "Initially, Pennington said, the system will use two images of Linux -- one
> per 512 processors -- while it's being tested and configured. Later, all 1,024
> processors will address one image of the SGI Advanced Linux operating system
> being used."

1k is not really "far beyond" 512. I'm sure it's doable, but I doubt
that this (or bigger machines) will spread too much. The progress in
cluster interconnect technology and software is just too fast. Think
of price/performance and stability (MTBF accumulation) and judge
yourself. Sure, if Linux could survive breaking hardware, the story
might change.

> Also here ->
> it talks about another supercomputer of 2048 CPUs, but I don't find clear
> if it's a cluster, or several images. 

That was advertised to be a fraction of the Columbia machine, so a
cluster of big machines.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Mon Nov 8 12:30:14 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:32 EST