Re: [RFC] prefer allocations from nodes w/o CPUs

From: Alex Tsariounov <>
Date: 2004-11-05 04:59:28
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:49:53AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, November 4, 2004 9:33 am, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Memory local to the node will come first, followed by the closest memory
> > that doesn't have associated CPUs, followed by memory belonging to other
> > CPUs.
> Actually, I lied.  There's a bug in find_next_best_node that prevents the 
> local node from coming first if the PENALTY_FOR_NODE_WITH_CPUS is set high 
> enough.  Here's the fix (I'll send it to Andrew shortly).

Great!  Thanks for the review.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Nov 4 13:11:23 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:32 EST