> Wouldn't alternative_input() choosing between a cmpxchg and a call be > the way to go here? Or is the overhead too high in an inline function? It would if you want the absolute micro optimization yes. Disadvantage is that you would waste some more space for nops in the !CONFIG_I386 case. I personally don't think it matters much and that Christian's original code was just fine. -Andi (last post on the thread) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Sep 23 05:04:44 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:31 EST