Re: [ACPI] PATCH-ACPI based CPU hotplug[1/6]-ACPI core enhancement support

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas_at_hp.com>
Date: 2004-09-21 06:26:31
On Monday 20 September 2004 1:01 pm, Keshavamurthy Anil S wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 01:26:44PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Also, introducing recursion (depth does not seem to be limited here) is
> > not a good idea IMHO - better convert it into iteration to avoid stack
> > problems down teh road.
> Humm, I guess recursion should be fine and even though the code does not have
> an explicit limit, the ACPI namespace describing the Ejectable device will limit the
> number of recursible devices. And I believe this won;t be more than 3 to 4 level depth.
> Hence recursion is fine here.
> 
> If you still strongly believe that recursion is not the right choice here, 
> let me know and I will convert it to iteration.

I'm also in favor of removing the recursion, if only because it
allows local analysis.  I.e., a correctness argument based solely
on the code in the patch is much more useful than one that relies
on properties of an external and mostly unknown ACPI namespace.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Mon Sep 20 16:28:41 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:30 EST