Here's an example: > -----Original Message----- > From: acpi-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:acpi-devel- > admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Martin Ginkel > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:09 PM > To: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: oysteigi@stud.ntnu.no > Subject: Re: [ACPI] Wrong AC state > > Martin Ginkel wrote: > > On my laptop (Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo D 8830) this seems to be > > partially broken. The /proc/ac_adapter/AC0/state has a value on-line > > or off-line from boot-time and doesn't change later on. > > OK found a solution while reading the disassembled DSDT: > The Code ist checking the OS-Version: > > Method (_PSR, 0, NotSerialized) > { > If (LNot (LEqual (FAKE, 0x00))) > { > Return (0x00) > } > Else > { > If (LOr (LEqual (OSFL (), 0x00), LEqual (OSFL (), 0x04))) > { > Store (\_SB.PCI0.SBRG.EC0.XCIN, Local0) > } > Else > { > Store (ACIN, Local0) > } > > Return (Local0) > } > } > > > OSFL is returning 0x00 for win2000 and 0x04 for windows nt. > I defined as a dirty fix: > ./include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:50: > #define ACPI_OS_NAME "Microsoft Windows NT" > > Now the Power Monitor reacts instantly. > > Well: the Bios seems to be designed for Microsoft Windows ;-P > > > CU > Martin > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle > 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Acpi-devel mailing list > Acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel > -----Original Message----- > From: Moore, Robert > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 3:11 PM > To: 'Gerald Pfeifer' > Cc: Brown, Len; Alex Williamson; linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org; ACPI > Developers > Subject: RE: [ACPI] [PATCH] restore _OS object to "Linux" for ia64 > > I don't know what the specific machines were. There was lots of > discussion on the Linux/ACPI list before we did this. I think they were > all 32-bit machines, however. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:gp@suse.de] > > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 2:30 PM > > To: Moore, Robert > > Cc: Brown, Len; Alex Williamson; linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org; ACPI > > Developers > > Subject: RE: [ACPI] [PATCH] restore _OS object to "Linux" for ia64 > > > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Moore, Robert wrote: > > > Not only is the !Windows code path apparently untested for the most > > > part, we have discovered many machines that simply do not work > properly > > > unless we report "Microsoft Windows NT" for the _OS string. > > > > Can you name some of these (broken) systems? > > > > Given that we apparently did not encounter this with our 2.6.5-based > SLES9 > > kernel so far, I'm a bit sceptical that many (if any) ia64 machines are > > affected. > > > > Gerald - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Mon Sep 13 19:11:53 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:30 EST