Re: [RFC&PATCH 1/2] PCI Error Recovery (readX_check)

From: Grant Grundler <>
Date: 2004-08-26 01:52:13
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:20:45AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Because if you don't lock the bridge (or whatever the entity is that keeps 
> track of errors), the whole exercise is kind of pointless. If two drivers 
> try to do error checking at the same time, and will potentially clear the 
> errors of each other, causing the errors to get lost, the whole recovery 
> infrastructure is clearly worthless.

Do we only need to determine there was an error in the IO hierarchy
or do we also need to know which device/driver caused the error?

If the latter I agree with linus. If the former, then the error recovery
can support asyncronous errors (like the bad DMA address case) and tell
all affected (thanks willy) drivers.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Wed Aug 25 11:56:58 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:30 EST