Re: [PATCH 1/4] SGI Altix cross partition functionality

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch_at_infradead.org>
Date: 2004-08-24 03:52:39
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:10:08PM -0500, Dean Nelson wrote:
> Although I agree that the nodemask_t patch is the proper solution to the
> numnodes issue, I don't feel that waiting for its arrival should prevent
> my continuing on with my XP[C|NET] patch. So I'm going to resubmit my
> proposed patch with numnodes exported. This is with the understanding
> that once the nodemask_t patch is accepted by the community (resulting
> in the 'EXPORT_SYMBOL(numnodes);' line being deleted), I'll be glade to
> rework the two XPC functions to use the 'for_each_node()' macro instead.

Can you post a current snapshot of your work?  As in the last mail numnodes
is not the kind if 'interface' we'd like to export, especially with things
like node hotplug in the pipe.

p.s. and linux-ia64 is the wrong list for discussing that
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Mon Aug 23 13:54:30 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:29 EST