Re: [PATCH] add scheduler domains for ia64

From: Nick Piggin <>
Date: 2004-08-20 12:11:06
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Saturday, August 14, 2004 8:54 pm, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>Yeah, all the SD_*_INIT values are overridable. We could even say, put
>>in an SD_NODE2_INIT for a 2nd level NUMA domain in the generic code,
>>for example.
> Yeah, we'll need different values for each level in the hierarchy.
>>I'd say your closest-node setup would probably get close to what you want.
>>The main thing you want is to not do huge amounts of balancing work in
>>interrupt context, and also not to move a task from one side of the
>>system to the other when one node is a little bit out of balance.
>>I guess if you want to do anything fancier then we can take a look at
>>re-exporting the domain setup.
> Ok, sounds good.  How does this look?  It sits on top of, ripping 
> out the ia64 specific bits and moving things to sched.c.  I've also added an 
> ia64 specific SD_NODE_INIT and an #if !defined to sched.c

Sorry I haven't replied earlier.  I think this looks good, provided
it does the right thing for you (I can't test it myself). Send it to
Andrew to get merged if you'd like.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Aug 19 22:11:31 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:29 EST