> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Robin Holt ... > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 06:29:04PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 05:23:46PM +0000, Tony Luck wrote: .... > > > > > > Would you also need "_nolock" and "_reentrant" versions? Yes, that would be perfect. > > > > Please make the exports _GPL so we have the callers under rcontrol. > > If you make them GPL, it makes the call useless to SGI. Some of our > tests suites have the problem description we are testing for and the > resolution. This may include vendor specific or customer specific > data which is not disclosable. Some of the vendor specific tests are > likewise covered by NDA. I understand you would love to have > everything _GPL, but that is unreasonable. > > All that is being provided here is a gateway to SAL. How much value > is the kernel community adding. > > Tony, please carefully consider the _GPL. > I have to second to this. John Platform Solutions - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Aug 19 18:17:53 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:29 EST